
I came across an old article that confirmed a lingering suspicion I've always had a Feminist, Cultural Marxism and Communism.
I've often said that Feminism and Communism were just two heads on the same monster since they both aggressively pushed "forced equality".
But paradoxically, I could never understand how Russian women with their background so deeply rooted in Soviet tradition and history have managed to maintain their feminine identities and traditional nature so completely intact.
Well, it turns out that the USSR was a disastrous experiment with Feminism in the early stages of Soviet history, and they knew better.
Check out this piece Dominic Lawson from the UK Independent.
In the early years of the Soviet Union was a genuine attempt, best described in Ferdinand Mount in the family subversive, to apply Marxist thinking about the family. Lunacharskogo Commissar of Education, said that "Our task now is to do away with the household and to free women from the care of children ... the terms" my parents "," our children "will gradually fall into disuse, replaced by concepts such as" old "," children "and" children ".
This, argued Lunacharsky will transition to a "general public, that a society that will replace the domestic hearth, yes, it is a stagnant one family, who separates himself from society. Genuine Communist would avoid such a permanent pairing marriage and would seek to meet their needs, freedom of relationship ... so that you can not tell who is connected with whom and how closely. That is a social construction. "
The consequences of this policy were exactly as they were in the "social construction" we now see in some parts of our own inner cities: social chaos, abandoned children and the rapid increase in sexually transmitted diseases.
The Communist Party of the Soviet Union soon began to abandon the Marxist approach to family life. New laws were introduced to compel divorced parents, not the state, to contribute to the maintenance of their children. Divorce itself has become more difficult and expensive.
Trotsky, who was in the forefront of the fight with the family experiment, became a scapegoat in this as in other matters. Now he was denounced as an "enemy of the people, who together with his followers met the family in the USSR with filth, spreading counter-revolutionary 'theory' about the withering away of the family or disorderly sexual cohabitation, in order to discredit the Soviet Union."
Starting to make a connection here?
USSR basically realized that Feminism could be used as an excellent weapon to destabilize their enemies in the West, and particularly the United States.
Communism has always positioned itself as a global revolution that has been the spread of long-term goal of tyranny in the U.S. and elsewhere.
He first tried to do it, pitching the "class struggle", but when this approach fails to make any serious steps they have taken a different tact instead.
They simply become "class struggle" in the "Gender Struggle" and contributed to it as "women's rights" and feminism.
Communist were, of course, no dummies when it came to handling Feminism in kid gloves, which were compatible HazMat.
Feminism was a really toxic and dangerous things to their own society.
So during the Cold War evil empire pack Feminism as raspberry ice cream made with Chinese milk and serotonin inhibitors, and then export it to the West.
Others say it is history, as Oprah, Rossi O'Donnell and Jenny Craig is the new torch bearers of American womanhood.
Check out this valuable article by Henry Mac
"Rape is an expression of male supremacy ... ... age-old economic, political and cultural exploitation of women by men."
Does this sound like the modern radical feminist?
Guess again. It was in 1948 the American Communist Party pamphlet entitled "Woman Against Myth" Mary Inman.
In a recent book, Red Feminism: American Communism and the emergence of women's liberation (2002), a feminist historian Kate Weigand states: "ideas, activists and traditions that emanated from the Communist movement in the forties and fifties continued to shape the direction of the new women's movement of the 1960s and later. "
In fact, Weigand, Smith College professor, shows that modern feminism is a direct result of American Communism.
There is nothing that feminists said or did in 1960-1980's, which is not prefigured in the CPUSA in the 1940s and 1950s. Many of the second wave feminist leaders of the "red-diaper babies," children of Communists.
Communists for the first time the political and cultural analysis of the oppression of women. They originated women's studies and public speaking kindergarten, birth control, abortion and even children's rights.
They forged key feminist concepts such as "the personal is political" and techniques such as "consciousness raising." In the late 1940's, CPUSA leaders realized that the labor movement is becoming increasingly hostile to Communism.
They began to focus on women and African Americans. They hoped "male supremacy" would "bring more women into the organization and in the struggle against domestic policy, the Cold War." (80) Communist women, who constitute 40% of the party wanted more freedom to attend party meetings.
After the publication of "Women Against Myth" in 1948, the CPUSA initiated a process of "re-education" of men, that we recognize only too well today. For example, the party newspaper "Daily Worker" caption man with a young child read, "Families and more happier if the father knows how to fix the cereal, tie bibs and take care of young people. "(127)
The Party ordered men who did not take women seriously question a full 'control objectives, including research on women's issues. "In 1954, the Los Angeles Department of disciplined men for" hogging the discussion at club meetings, bypassing women comrades in leadership and sex jokes humiliate women . "(94)
The film Salt of the Earth, which critic Pauline Kael called "Communist propaganda", portrayed women taking a decisive role in the strike of labor of their husbands. "Against the wishes of her husband, Esperanza became a leader in the strike, and for the first time forged a role for themselves outside of their families ... [her] political successes persuaded Ramon to accept a new model of family life." (132) image of strong assertive successful women became as common in the Communist press and schools, as in the media today.
Communist women formalized sophisticated Marxist analysis of the "woman question." Books for Women (1940), Mary Inman, Century Struggle (1954) Eleanor Flexner and Unfinished Revolution (1962) Eve Merriam recorded the oppression of women and condemned sexism in mass culture and language.
For example, Mary Inman argued that "manufactured femininity" and "overemphasis on beauty" keeps women in subjection (33). The founder of modern feminism, Betty Frieden relied on these texts when she wrote Women Mysticism (1963).
These women all hid the fact that they were old Communist activists. In 1960, their daughter had everything necessary, including an example of tricks to start the women's liberation movement. Feminism is rooted in Marxist communism, to explain a lot about this curious but dangerous movement. He explains:
* Why "women's movement" hates femininity and imposes a political-economic concept like "equality" for personal, biological and mystical relationship.
* Why "women's movement," includes the equality of races and classes.
* Why they want revolution ("transformation") and have a messianic vision of gender at Utopia.
* Why do they believe human nature is infinitely malleable and can be shaped through education and enforcement.
* Why do they engage in endless, mind-numbing theorizing, doctrinal disputes and factionalism.
* Why truth for them is a "social construct" defined by who has the strength and appearance is more important than reality.
* Why they reject God, nature and scientific evidence to support his political agenda.
* Why do they refuse to discuss, do not believe in freedom of speech, and suppress dissent.
* Why do they behave like quasi-religious cult, or, as the Red Guard.
It is hard to escape the conclusion that feminism communism differently. Having failed to sell a class war, communism, promoted gender conflict instead. "Diversity" and "multicultural" movements represent an attempt to forge feminist "loyalty" by empowering gays and "people of color."
Thus, the original CPUSA trio of "race, gender and class" is intact but class conflict has never been a big seller. The term "politically correct" originated in the Russian Communist Party in 1920. It is used in America today illustrates the extent of society was destroyed. Feminist activists in the main Communist deceived.
The Communist goal is to destroy Western civilization, which is dedicated to genuine diversity (pluralism), individual liberty and equal opportunity (but not equal results). We saw the destruction in the dismantling of the liberal arts program and traditions of freedom of speech and inquiry at our universities.
We have seen this virus spread to government, business, media and military. This could happen only because of the financial elite is actually sponsored communism. "Political correctness" has dulled and regimented our cultural life.
Recently here in Winnipeg, Betty Granger, conservative school trustee referred to house price increases because of the "Asian invasion." Granger was mercilessly pilloried in the press. People sent hate letters and dumped trash on his lawn. At a meeting of the Council of Schools, the President admitted that she was not racist. He acknowledged that Asians are not married to his family. However, Granger was convicted because, I quote, "appearance is more important than reality."
This detachment from the pier of objective truth is the hallmark of Communism. The atmosphere at the meeting had been charged. Mild-mannered Canadians, all champions of "tolerance" they behaved like wild dogs ready to tear the wounded rabbit.
Betty Granger repented and voted in favor of conviction. These rituals of denunciation and contrition, typical of Stalinist Russia or Maoist China, are becoming commonplace in America. They are similar to showtrials designed to scare everyone in line.
We have "diversity officers" and "human rights commissions" and "sensitivity training" to support the feminist slogans. They talk about "discrimination", but they freely discriminate against white heterosexual men and feminine women.
They use the charge of "sexual harassment" to forge between male and female relations, and cleaning of their opponents. In 1980, three women in Leningrad produced 10 typewritten copies of a feminist magazine called Almanac. KGB shut down the magazine and the women were deported to West Germany. In the USSR, feminism has largely exported.
According to Professor Weigand, her "book contains evidence supporting the view that at least some Communists regarded the gender subversion of the system [in America] as an integral part of the larger fight to overturn capitalism." (6)
In conclusion, the feminist pursuit of "equal rights" mask for insulting the Communist agenda. Communist Defense has always been deception, infiltration and subversion.
The aim is to destroy Western civilization and the creation of a new world order run by monopoly capital. Red Feminism Kate Weigand demonstrates that the Communist agenda is alive and well and living under an assumed name.
Meanwhile, in Russia ...
Natural and traditional values of Russian ladies were allowed to flourish.
Mother Russia quickly returned to what a proud, beautiful and educating myself again.
And pooped to "Russian Women" returns 8 million sites adoring.